Voor diegene die vipveiling overwegen, bekijk dit eens.
Ik zocht naar sites met informatie en reacties van mensen die vipveiling gebruiken, toen kwam ik uit op:
http://www.actueelconsumentengids.com/d ... n-2012.php
Deze site is zo goed als zeker door iemand van vipveiling zelf in elkaar gezet, dit is de enige pagina van de site, alles waar je op denkt te kunnen klikken behalve links naar vipveiling zelf zijn plaatjes waarmee je dus niet verder komt.
En de reacties zijn uitgeschakeld i.v.m. zogenaamde spam.
Alle overige reacties op sites, over wat mensen wel niet voor mooie dealtjes hebben weten binnen te slepen komen overigens ook niet erg geloofwaardig over, accounts die 1 bericht in totaal hebben gepost.
Mvg,
Tim
| LET OP: Dit topic is meer dan drie jaar geleden geplaatst. De informatie is mogelijk verouderd. |
[ archief ] Vipveiling.nl
Re: Vipveiling.nl
Hieronder wat knip- en plakwerk (en hier en daar ingekort)van de WIPO-site, waar gevechten over domeinnaamregistraties worden behandeld.. Hier de uitspraak over de klacht van De Consumentenbond over deze "consumentengids2013" Voor de volldige tekst: www.wipo.int
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Consumentenbond v. Private registrant, A happy DreamHost customer / Paul Snow or Philippe Aime
Case No. D2013-1071
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Consumentenbond of The Hague, the Netherlands, represented by SOLV Advocaten, the Netherlands. The Respondent is Private registrant, A happy DreamHost customer / Paul Snow or Philippe Aime of Brea, California, the United States of America and La Conversion, Switzerland, respectively.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <consumentengidsonline2013.com> is registered with New Dream Network, LLC dba DreamHost.com (the “Registrar”).
4. Factual Background
The Complainant was founded in 1953 as the agency responsible for defending and protecting consumer rights in the Netherlands. Since April 1953 it has published a monthly magazine, offering independent tests and reviews of consumer goods and services, under the title “Consumentengids.” The Complainant secured trademark registration for the CONSUMENTENGIDS mark in November 1984. As of March 2013, when the disputed domain name was registered, the Complainant’s “Consumentengids” periodical had roughly 475,000 subscribers.
B. Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has clearly established its rights in the CONSUMENTENGIDS mark by virtue of its nearly thirty-year old registration for the term, which it uses in connection with its well-circulated periodical.
The Respondent has identified its activities on the website as those of “Actueel-Consumentengids,” a name which mimics the official title of the Complainant’s well-circulated consumer interest magazine. Thus, the Panel finds it likely that the Respondent has used the domain name, and its associated website, to secure commercial gain by trading on the recognition and goodwill associated with the Complainant’s mark. Such use of the disputed domain name neither constitutes a bona fide offering of goods or services nor a legitimate noncommercial or fair use.
Under these circumstances, the Panel takes the view that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name and that the requirement of paragraph 4(a)(ii) is also satisfied.
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
The Complainant has provided evidence of its CONSUMENTENGIDS trademark, which has been registered since 1984 for use in connection with its consumer protection and interest magazine. The disputed domain name was registered on March 21, 2013, nearly thirty years after the Complainant’s mark was registered, and sixty years after the Complainant’s magazine entered circulation under the same name. The Respondent has formerly used the disputed domain name to offer auction services, trading on the authority of the Complainant’s name to lend an air of legitimacy to its actions. Thus, it is clear to the Panel that the Respondent was fully aware of the Complainant and its mark when it selected the disputed domain name.
The Panel therefore concludes that the requirement of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy has also been met.
7. Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name <consumentengidsonline2013.com> be transferred to the Complainant.
Torsten Bettinger
Sole Panelist
Date: August 26, 2013
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Consumentenbond v. Private registrant, A happy DreamHost customer / Paul Snow or Philippe Aime
Case No. D2013-1071
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Consumentenbond of The Hague, the Netherlands, represented by SOLV Advocaten, the Netherlands. The Respondent is Private registrant, A happy DreamHost customer / Paul Snow or Philippe Aime of Brea, California, the United States of America and La Conversion, Switzerland, respectively.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <consumentengidsonline2013.com> is registered with New Dream Network, LLC dba DreamHost.com (the “Registrar”).
4. Factual Background
The Complainant was founded in 1953 as the agency responsible for defending and protecting consumer rights in the Netherlands. Since April 1953 it has published a monthly magazine, offering independent tests and reviews of consumer goods and services, under the title “Consumentengids.” The Complainant secured trademark registration for the CONSUMENTENGIDS mark in November 1984. As of March 2013, when the disputed domain name was registered, the Complainant’s “Consumentengids” periodical had roughly 475,000 subscribers.
B. Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has clearly established its rights in the CONSUMENTENGIDS mark by virtue of its nearly thirty-year old registration for the term, which it uses in connection with its well-circulated periodical.
The Respondent has identified its activities on the website as those of “Actueel-Consumentengids,” a name which mimics the official title of the Complainant’s well-circulated consumer interest magazine. Thus, the Panel finds it likely that the Respondent has used the domain name, and its associated website, to secure commercial gain by trading on the recognition and goodwill associated with the Complainant’s mark. Such use of the disputed domain name neither constitutes a bona fide offering of goods or services nor a legitimate noncommercial or fair use.
Under these circumstances, the Panel takes the view that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name and that the requirement of paragraph 4(a)(ii) is also satisfied.
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
The Complainant has provided evidence of its CONSUMENTENGIDS trademark, which has been registered since 1984 for use in connection with its consumer protection and interest magazine. The disputed domain name was registered on March 21, 2013, nearly thirty years after the Complainant’s mark was registered, and sixty years after the Complainant’s magazine entered circulation under the same name. The Respondent has formerly used the disputed domain name to offer auction services, trading on the authority of the Complainant’s name to lend an air of legitimacy to its actions. Thus, it is clear to the Panel that the Respondent was fully aware of the Complainant and its mark when it selected the disputed domain name.
The Panel therefore concludes that the requirement of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy has also been met.
7. Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name <consumentengidsonline2013.com> be transferred to the Complainant.
Torsten Bettinger
Sole Panelist
Date: August 26, 2013
